By submitting questionnaire to students in the dorm room and determining which variables, when present, seemed to correlate with higher grades and were potential 'causal' factors in higher grades, the researchers could then call their endeavor an experimental study. (Note that in this experiment there would be no formal control group, instead seeing what clusters of variables were present in high-achieving students would be the focus).
In general, the great advantage of experiments over other study designs is that, with an experimental design, you can more easily demonstrate cause-and-effect relationships. Doing a simple observational case study of students on a dorm hall would expose the researcher to many extraneous variables that could affect students' study habits all at once, and would make it difficult to compare his or her study with other surveys of factors that enhance student performance on tests.
However, constructing studies that meet the criteria for experiments is not always feasible. Sometimes, ethically, a researcher may wish to study the effects of certain variables, like that of long-term illegal drug use, which cannot support an experimental design. Following the lives and surveying vital physical data about volunteers who were drug users might be one way to accumulate important data. "Perhaps the simplest [non-experimental] design is the correlational design or quasi-experimental design. A study qualifies as correlational if the data lend themselves only to interpretations about the degree to which certain things tend to...
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now